Go to content

Our newly redesigned website will enhance your Cogency experience! Read more here.

Five professionals in business attire sit and stand around a table in a bright modern office, engaged in discussion with documents, laptops, and coffee cups on the table. Large windows let in natural light.

Global Trends in Corporate Transparency

An international movement toward transparency is driving governments to mandate disclosure of who ultimately owns or controls companies.

What this is: An international movement toward transparency is driving governments to mandate disclosure of who ultimately owns or controls companies.
What this means: Companies must stay ahead of varying global regulations to avoid penalties, maintain credibility, and operate with confidence in a shifting compliance landscape.

Europe’s Leadership in Beneficial Ownership Reform

Over the past decade, corporate transparency has become a central issue in global discussions, with European nations leading the charge in implementing regulations to curb money laundering facilitated by anonymous corporate structures.
While European nations, including the EU, continue to navigate the delicate balance between full disclosure of corporate beneficial ownership and privacy protections of the individuals, significant progress has been achieved through the implementation of the 5th and 6th EU Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Directives.

Expanding Transparency: The US, Asia, and Emerging Global Standards

Discussions on corporate transparency have gained traction worldwide, particularly in the United States, where debates focus on a less stringent version of Europe’s regulations. Although the US has temporarily paused its reporting requirements, it is promising to see these conversations taking place among key stakeholders. Meanwhile, several Asian countries have introduced or drafted corporate transparency legislation in recent years, with efforts aimed at strengthening governance, improving financial disclosures, and aligning with international standards. 

Our compliance filing services enable you to file on time, stay compliant and in good standing.

Let’s explore how different countries are shaping and enforcing beneficial ownership laws and reporting requirements. 

Comparing Global Approaches to Beneficial Ownership Reporting

CountryPublic or Private Beneficial Ownership RegisterThreshold for Beneficial OwnershipRegulatory AuthorityTypes of Companies Required to ReportCompliance & Enforcement
USAPrivate (FinCEN database)25% ownership or more – significant controlFinancial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)Only applies foreign companies registered in the US at this time. Reporting Requirements for US companies have been paused.Strict penalties, including fines & imprisonment
CanadaPublic Federal register and provincial registers vary (some public, some private).25% ownership or more – significant controlFINTRAC, Corporations Canada (CBCA), plus provincial regulators.Federal (CBCA) and other provinces (BC, ON, MB, NB, NL, PE, SK, QC, NS); some exemptions exist. Applies to Corporations, partnerships and certain trustsFines up to $200,000, imprisonment up to six months, additional provincial penalties.
UKPublic (People with Significant Control Register)More than 25% shares or voting rightsCompanies HouseAll UK-incorporated companies, LLPs, SEsMandatory and continuous reporting, accessible to public
NorwayPrivate (Register of Beneficial Owners)More than 25% ownership or controlBrønnøysund Register CentreLimited companies, savings banks, housing cooperatives, foreign entitiesRegulators & financial institutions have access Voluntary reporting phase from October 2024, mandatory reporting commences from July 31, 2025.
BVIPrivate (Beneficial Ownership Secure Search System – BOSS)10% ownership or controlRegistry of Corporate AffairsAll BVI Business Companies & Limited PartnershipsStrict filing deadlines, penalties for non-compliance
SingaporePrivate (Register of Registrable Controllers)More than 25% ownership or controlAccounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA)Companies, LLPs, foreign entities registered in SingaporeAccess limited to regulators & financial institutions
Hong KongPrivate (Significant Controllers Register)More than 25% ownership or controlCompanies RegistryAll Hong Kong-incorporated companies (except listed companies)Companies must maintain records but no public access
AustraliaProposed Public RegisterThreshold under reviewAUSTRAC & TreasuryExpected to cover corporations, trusts, and partnershipsExpected mandatory reporting, but details still evolving
IrelandLimited access (Central Register of Beneficial Ownership – RBO)More than 25% ownership or controlCompanies Registration Office (CRO) & RBOAll Irish-incorporated companies & industrial/provident societiesMandatory reporting, accessible to designated persons & authorities. Access limited pursuant to Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling
UAEPrivate (UBO Register)25% ownership or significant controlMinistry of Economy & Licensing AuthoritiesAll UAE-registered companies except government-owned & listed entitiesStrict penalties, including fines up to AED 1,000,000

Transparency as a Competitive Imperative for Global Businesses

Corporate transparency continues to evolve as governments and businesses worldwide strengthen regulations to combat financial crime, enhance accountability, and build investor confidence. Emerging technologies, such as AI and blockchain, are also shaping the future of corporate governance, making compliance more efficient and data driven. As transparency becomes a cornerstone of ethical business practices, companies must adapt to evolving regulations to maintain trust and competitiveness in the global market. This is an interesting space to watch out for in the coming years. 

This article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered, or relied upon, as legal advice.

Get industry insights sent straight to your inbox!